Math::Symbolic man page on Fedora

Man page or keyword search:  
man Server   31170 pages
apropos Keyword Search (all sections)
Output format
Fedora logo
[printable version]

Math::Symbolic(3)     User Contributed Perl Documentation    Math::Symbolic(3)

NAME
       Math::Symbolic - Symbolic calculations

SYNOPSIS
	 use Math::Symbolic;

	 my $tree = Math::Symbolic->parse_from_string('1/2 * m * v^2');
	 # Now do symbolic calculations with $tree.
	 # ... like deriving it...

	 my ($sub) = Math::Symbolic::Compiler->compile_to_sub($tree);

	 my $kinetic_energy = $sub->($mass, $velocity);

DESCRIPTION
       Math::Symbolic is intended to offer symbolic calculation capabilities
       to the Perl programmer without using external (and commercial)
       libraries and/or applications.

       Unless, however, some interested and knowledgable developers turn up to
       participate in the development, the library will be severely limited by
       my experience in the area. Symbolic calculations are an active field of
       research in CS.

       There are several ways to construct Math::Symbolic trees. There are no
       actual Math::Symbolic objects, but rather trees of objects of
       subclasses of Math::Symbolic. The most general but unfortunately also
       the least intuitive way of constructing trees is to use the
       constructors of the Math::Symbolic::Operator, Math::Symbolic::Variable,
       and Math::Symbolic::Constant classes to create (nested) objects of the
       corresponding types.

       Furthermore, you may use the overloaded interface to apply the standard
       Perl operators (and functions, see "OVERLOADED OPERATORS") to existing
       Math::Symbolic trees and standard Perl expressions.

       Possibly the most convenient way of constructing Math::Symbolic trees
       is using the builtin parser to generate trees from expressions such as
       '2 * x^5'.  You may use the Math::Symbolic->parse_from_string() class
       method for this.

       Of course, you may combine the overloaded interface with the parser to
       generate trees with Perl code such as "$term * 5 * 'sin(omega*t+phi)'"
       which will create a tree of the existing tree $term times 5 times the
       sine of the vars omega times t plus phi.

       There are several modules in the distribution that contain subroutines
       related to calculus. These are not loaded by Math::Symbolic by default.
       Furthermore, there are several extensions to Math::Symbolic available
       from CPAN as separate distributions. Please refer to "SEE ALSO" for an
       incomplete list of these.

       For example, Math::Symbolic::MiscCalculus come with Math::Symbolic and
       contains routines to compute Taylor Polynomials and the associated
       errors.

       Routines related to vector calculus such as grad, div, rot, and Jacobi-
       and Hesse matrices are available through the
       Math::Symbolic::VectorCalculus module. This module is also able to
       compute Taylor Polynomials of functions of two variables, directional
       derivatives, total differentials, and Wronskian Determinants.

       Some basic support for linear algebra can be found in
       Math::Symbolic::MiscAlgebra. This includes a routine to compute the
       determinant of a matrix of Math::Symbolic trees.

   EXPORT
       None by default, but you may choose to have the following constants
       exported to your namespace using the standard Exporter semantics.
       There are two export tags: :all and :constants. :all will export all
       constants and the parse_from_string subroutine.

	 Constants for transcendetal numbers:
	   EULER (2.7182...)
	   PI	 (3.14159...)

	 Constants representing operator types: (First letter indicates arity)
	 (These evaluate to the same numbers that are returned by the type()
	  method of Math::Symbolic::Operator objects.)
	   B_SUM
	   B_DIFFERENCE
	   B_PRODUCT
	   B_DIVISION
	   B_LOG
	   B_EXP
	   U_MINUS
	   U_P_DERIVATIVE (partial derivative)
	   U_T_DERIVATIVE (total derivative)
	   U_SINE
	   U_COSINE
	   U_TANGENT
	   U_COTANGENT
	   U_ARCSINE
	   U_ARCCOSINE
	   U_ARCTANGENT
	   U_ARCCOTANGENT
	   U_SINE_H
	   U_COSINE_H
	   U_AREASINE_H
	   U_AREACOSINE_H
	   B_ARCTANGENT_TWO

	 Constants representing Math::Symbolic term types:
	 (These evaluate to the same numbers that are returned by the term_type()
	  methods.)
	   T_OPERATOR
	   T_CONSTANT
	   T_VARIABLE

	 Subroutines:
	   parse_from_string (returns Math::Symbolic tree)

CLASS DATA
       The package variable $Parser will contain a Parse::RecDescent object
       that is used to parse strings at runtime.

SUBROUTINES
   parse_from_string
       This subroutine takes a string as argument and parses it using a
       Parse::RecDescent parser taken from the package variable
       $Math::Symbolic::Parser. It generates a Math::Symbolic tree from the
       string and returns that tree.

       The string may contain any identifiers matching /[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]*/
       which will be parsed as variables of the corresponding name.

       Please refer to Math::Symbolic::Parser for more information.

EXAMPLES
       This example demonstrates variable and operator creation using object
       prototypes as well as partial derivatives and the various ways of
       applying derivatives and simplifying terms. Furthermore, it shows how
       to use the compiler for simple expressions.

	 use Math::Symbolic qw/:all/;

	 my $energy = parse_from_string(<<'HERE');
	       kinetic(mass, velocity, time) +
	       potential(mass, z, time)
	 HERE

	 $energy->implement(kinetic => '(1/2) * mass * velocity(time)^2');
	 $energy->implement(potential => 'mass * g * z(t)');

	 $energy->set_value(g => 9.81); # permanently

	 print "Energy is: $energy\n";

	 # Is how does the energy change with the height?
	 my $derived = $energy->new('partial_derivative', $energy, 'z');
	 $derived = $derived->apply_derivatives()->simplify();

	 print "Changes with the heigth as: $derived\n";

	 # With whatever values you fancy:
	 print "Putting in some sample values: ",
	       $energy->value(mass => 20, velocity => 10, z => 5),
	       "\n";

	 # Too slow?
	 $energy->implement(g => '9.81'); # To get rid of the variable

	 my ($sub) = Math::Symbolic::Compiler->compile($energy);

	 print "This was much faster: ",
	       $sub->(20, 10, 5),  # vars ordered alphabetically
	       "\n";

OVERLOADED OPERATORS
       Since version 0.102, several arithmetic operators have been overloaded.

       That means you can do most arithmetic with Math::Symbolic trees just as
       if they were plain Perl scalars.

       The following operators are currently overloaded to produce valid
       Math::Symbolic trees when applied to an expression involving at least
       one Math::Symbolic object:

	 +, -, *, /, **, sqrt, log, exp, sin, cos

       Furthermore, some contexts have been overloaded with particular
       behaviour: '""' (stringification context) has been overloaded to
       produce the string representation of the object. '0+' (numerical
       context) has been overloaded to produce the value of the object. 'bool'
       (boolean context) has been overloaded to produce the value of the
       object.

       If one of the operands of an overloaded operator is a Math::Symbolic
       tree and the over is undef, the module will throw an error unless the
       operator is a + or a -. If the operator is an addition, the result will
       be the original Math::Symbolic tree. If the operator is a subtraction,
       the result will be the negative of the Math::Symbolic tree. Reason for
       this inconsistent behaviour is that it makes idioms like the following
       possible:

	 @objects = (... list of Math::Symbolic trees ...);
	 $sum += $_ foreach @objects;

       Without this behaviour, you would have to shift the first object into
       $sum before using it. This is not a problem in this case, but if you
       are applying some complex calculation to each object in the loop body
       before adding it to the sum, you'd have to either split the code into
       two loops or replicate the code required for the complex calculation
       when shift()ing the first object into $sum.

EXTENDING THE MODULE
       Due to several design decisions, it is probably rather difficult to
       extend the Math::Symbolic related modules through subclassing. Instead,
       we chose to make the module extendable through delegation.

       That means you can introduce your own methods to extend
       Math::Symbolic's functionality. How this works in detail can be read in
       Math::Symbolic::Custom.

       Some of the extensions available via CPAN right now are listed in the
       "SEE ALSO" section.

PERFORMANCE
       Math::Symbolic can become quite slow if you use it wrong. To be honest,
       it can even be slow if you use it correctly. This section is meant to
       give you an idea about what you can do to have Math::Symbolic compute
       as quickly as possible. It has some explanation and a couple of 'red
       flags' to watch out for.	 We'll focus on two central points: Creation
       and evaluation.

   CREATING Math::Symbolic TREES
       Math::Symbolic provides several means of generating Math::Symbolic
       trees (which are just trees of Math::Symbolic::Constant,
       Math::Symbolic::Variable and most importantly Math::Symbolic::Operator
       objects).

       The most convenient way is to use the builtin parser (for example via
       the "parse_from_string()" subroutine). Problem is, this darn thing
       becomes really slow for long input strings. This is a known problem for
       Parse::RecDescent parsers and the Math::Symbolic grammar isn't the
       shortest either.

       Try to break the formulas you parse into smallish bits. Test the parser
       performance to see how small they need to be.

       I'll give a simple example where this first advice is gospel:

	 use Math::Symbolic qw/parse_from_string/;
	 my @formulas;
	 foreach my $var (qw/x y z foo bar baz/) {
	     my $formula = parse_from_string("sin(x)*$var+3*y^z-$var*x");
	     push @formulas, $formula;
	 }

       So what's wrong here? I'm parsing the whole formula every time. How
       about this?

	 use Math::Symbolic qw/parse_from_string/;
	 my @formulas;
	 my $sin = parse_from_string('sin(x)');
	 my $term = parse_from_string('3*y^z');
	 my $x = Math::Symbolic::Variable->new('x');
	 foreach my $var (qw/x y z foo bar baz/) {
		 my $v = $x->new($var);
	     my $formula = $sin*$var + $term - $var*$x;
	     push @formulas, $formula;
	 }

       I wouldn't call that more legible, but you notice how I moved all the
       heavy lifting out of the loop. You'll know and do this for normal code,
       but it's maybe not as obvious when dealing with such code. Now, since
       this is still slow and - if anything - ugly, we'll do something really
       clever now to get the best of both worlds!

	 use Math::Symbolic qw/parse_from_string/;
	 my @formulas;
	 my $proto = parse_from_string('sin(x)*var+3*y^z-var*x");
	 foreach my $var (qw/x y z foo bar baz/) {
	     my $formula = $proto->new();
	     $formula->implement(var => Math::Symbolic::Variable->new($var));
	     push @formulas, $formula;
	 }

       Notice how we can combine legibility of a clean formula with removing
       all parsing work from the loop? The "implement()" method is described
       in detail in Math::Symbolic::Base.

       On a side note: One thing you could do to bring your computer to its
       knees is to take a function like sin(a*x)*cos(b*x)/e^(2*x), derive that
       in respect to x a couple of times (like, erm, 50 times?), call
       "to_string()" on it and parse that string again.

       Almost as convenient as the parser is the overloaded interface.	That
       means, you create a Math::Symbolic object and use it in algebraic
       expressions as if it was a variable or number. This way, you can even
       multiply a Math::Symbolic tree with a string and have the string be
       parsed as a subtree.  Example:

	 my $x = Math::Symbolic::Variable->new('x');
	 my $formula = $x - sin(3*$x); # $formula will be a M::S tree
	 # or:
	 my $another = $x - 'sin(3*x)'; # have the string parsed as M::S tree

       This, however, turns out to be rather slow, too. It is only about two
       to five times faster than parsing the formula all the way.

       Use the overloaded interface to construct trees from existing
       Math::Symbolic objects, but if you need to create new trees quickly,
       resort to building them by hand.

       Finally, you can create objects using the "new()" constructors from
       Math::Symbolic::Operator and friends. These can be called in two forms,
       a long one that gives you complete control (signature for variables,
       etc.)  and a short hand. Even if it is just to protect your finger tips
       from burning, you should use the short hand whenever possible. It is
       also slightly faster.

       Use the constructors to build Math::Symbolic trees if you need speed.
       Using a prototype object and calling "new()" on that may help with the
       typing effort and should not result in a slow down.

   CRUNCHING NUMBERS WITH Math::Symbolic
       As with the generation of Math::Symbolic trees, the evaluation of a
       formula can be done in distinct ways.

       The simplest is, of course, to call "value()" on the tree and have that
       calculate the value of the formula. You might have to supply some input
       values to the formula via "value()", but you can also call
       "set_value()" before using "value()". But that's not faster.  For each
       call to "value()", the computer walks the complete Math::Symbolic tree
       and evaluates the nodes. If it reaches a leaf, the resulting value is
       propagated back up the tree. (It's a depth-first search.)

       Calling value() on a Math::Symbolic tree requires walking the tree for
       every evaluation of the formula. Use this if you'll evaluate the
       formula only a few times.

       You may be able to make the formula simpler using the Math::Symbolic
       simplification routines (like "simplify()" or some stuff in the
       Math::Symbolic::Custom::* modules). Simpler formula are quicker to
       evaluate.  In particular, the simplification should fold constants.

       If you're going to evaluate a tree many times, try simplifying it
       first.

       But again, your mileage may vary. Test first.

       If the overhead of calling "value()" is unaccepable, you should use the
       Math::Symbolic::Compiler to compile the tree to Perl code. (Which
       usually comes in compiled form as an anonymous subroutine.) Example:

	 my $tree = parse_from_string('3*x+sin(y)^(z+1)');
	 my $sub = $tree->to_sub(y => 0, x => 1, z => 2);
	 foreach (1..100) {
	   # define $x, $y, and $z
	   my $res = $sub->($y, $x, $z);
	   # faster than $tree->value(x => $x, y => $y, z => $z) !!!
	 }

       Compile your Math::Symbolic trees to Perl subroutines for evaluation in
       tight loops. The speedup is in the range of a few thousands.

       On an interesting side note, the subroutines compiled from
       Math::Symbolic trees are just as fast as hand-crafted, "performance
       tuned" subroutines.

       If you have extremely long formulas, you can choose to even resort to
       more extreme measures than generating Perl code. You can have
       Math::Symbolic generate C code for you, compile that and link it into
       your application at run time. It will then be available to you as a
       subroutine.

       This is not the most portable thing to do. (You need Inline::C which in
       turn needs the C compiler that was used to compile your perl.)
       Therefore, you need to install an extra module for this. It's called
       Math::Symbolic::Custom::CCompiler. The speed-up for short formulas is
       only about factor 2 due to the overhead of calling the Perl subroutine,
       but with sufficiently complicated formulas, you should be able to get a
       boost up to factor 100 or even 1000.

       For raw execution speed, compile your trees to C code using
       Math::Symbolic::Custom::CCompiler.

   PROOF
       In the last two sections, you were told a lot about the performance of
       two important aspects of Math::Symbolic handling. But eventhough
       benchmarks are very system dependent and have limited meaning to the
       general case, I'll supply some proof for what I claimed. This is Perl
       5.8.6 on linux-2.6.9, x86_64 (Athlon64 3200+).

       In the following tables, value means evaluation using the "value()"
       method, eval means evaluation of Perl code as a string, sub is a hand-
       crafted Perl subroutine, compiled is the compiled Perl code, c is the
       compiled C code. Evaluation of a very simple function yields:

	 f(x) = x*2
		       Rate    value	 eval	   sub compiled	       c
	 value	    17322/s	  --	 -68%	  -99%	   -99%	    -99%
	 eval	    54652/s	215%	   --	  -97%	   -97%	    -97%
	 sub	  1603578/s    9157%	2834%	    --	    -1%	    -16%
	 compiled 1616630/s    9233%	2858%	    1%	     --	    -15%
	 c	  1907541/s   10912%	3390%	   19%	    18%	      --

       We see that resorting to C is a waste in such simple cases. Compiling
       to a Perl sub, however is a good idea.

	 f(x,y,z) = x*y*z+sin(x*y*z)-cos(x*y*z)
		       Rate    value	 eval compiled	    sub	       c
	 value	     1993/s	  --	 -88%	 -100%	  -100%	   -100%
	 eval	    16006/s	703%	   --	  -97%	   -97%	    -99%
	 compiled  544217/s   27202%	3300%	    --	    -2%	    -56%
	 sub	   556737/s   27830%	3378%	    2%	     --	    -55%
	 c	  1232362/s   61724%	7599%	  126%	   121%	      --

	 f(x,y,z,a,b) = x^y^tan(a*z)^(y*sin(x^(z*b)))
		      Rate    value	eval compiled	   sub	      c
	 value	    2181/s	 --	-84%	 -99%	  -99%	  -100%
	 eval	   13613/s     524%	  --	 -97%	  -97%	   -98%
	 compiled 394945/s   18012%    2801%	   --	   -5%	   -48%
	 sub	  414328/s   18901%    2944%	   5%	    --	   -46%
	 c	  763985/s   34936%    5512%	  93%	   84%	     --

       These more involved examples show that using value() can become
       unpractical even if you're just doing a 2D plot with just a few
       thousand points.	 The C routines aren't that much faster, but they
       scale much better.

       Now for something different. Let's see whether I lied about the
       creation of Math::Symbolic trees. parse indicates that the parser was
       used to create the object tree. long indicates that the long syntax of
       the constructor was used. short... well. proto means that the objects
       were created from prototypes of the same class. For ol_long and
       ol_parse, I used the overloaded interface in conjunction with
       constructors or parsing (a la "$x * 'y+z'").

	 f(x) = x
		      Rate  parse  long	  short	 ol_long  ol_parse  proto
	 parse	     258/s     --  -100%  -100%	   -100%     -100%  -100%
	 long	   95813/s 37102%     --   -33%	    -34%      -34%   -35%
	 short	  143359/s 55563%    50%     --	     -2%       -2%    -3%
	 ol_long  146022/s 56596%    52%     2%	      --       -0%    -1%
	 ol_parse 146256/s 56687%    53%     2%	      0%	--    -1%
	 proto	  147119/s 57023%    54%     3%	      1%	1%     --

       Obviously, the parser gets blown to pieces, performance-wise. If you
       want to use it, but cannot accept its tranquility, you can ressort to
       Math::SymbolicX::Inline and have the formulas parsed at compile time.
       (Which isn't faster, but means that they are available when the program
       runs.)  All other methods are about the same speed. Note, that the ol_*
       tests are just the same as short here, because in case of "f(x) = x",
       you cannot make use of the overloaded interface.

	 f(x,y,a,b) = x*y(a,b)
		     Rate  parse  ol_parse ol_long   long  proto  short
	 parse	    125/s     --      -41%    -41%  -100%  -100%  -100%
	 ol_parse   213/s    70%	--     -0%   -99%   -99%   -99%
	 ol_long    213/s    70%	0%	--   -99%   -99%   -99%
	 long	  26180/s 20769%    12178%  12171%     --    -6%   -10%
	 proto	  27836/s 22089%    12955%  12947%     6%     --    -5%
	 short	  29148/s 23135%    13570%  13562%    11%     5%     --

	 f(x,a) = sin(x+a)*3-5*x
		     Rate    parse ol_long ol_parse	proto	  short
	 parse	   41.2/s	--    -83%     -84%	-100%	  -100%
	 ol_long    250/s     505%	--	-0%	 -97%	   -98%
	 ol_parse   250/s     506%	0%	 --	 -97%	   -98%
	 proto	   9779/s   23611%   3819%    3810%	   --	    -3%
	 short	  10060/s   24291%   3932%    3922%	   3%	     --

       The picture changes when we're dealing with slightly longer functions.
       The performance of the overloaded interface isn't that much better than
       the parser. (Since it uses the parser to convert non-Math::Symbolic
       operands.)  ol_long should, however, be faster than ol_parse. I'll
       refine the benchmark somewhen. The three other construction methods are
       still about the same speed. I omitted the long version in the last
       benchmark because the typing work involved was unnerving.

AUTHOR
       Please send feedback, bug reports, and support requests to the
       Math::Symbolic support mailing list: math-symbolic-support at lists dot
       sourceforge dot net. Please consider letting us know how you use
       Math::Symbolic. Thank you.

       If you're interested in helping with the development or extending the
       module's functionality, please contact the developers' mailing list:
       math-symbolic-develop at lists dot sourceforge dot net.

       List of contributors:

	 Steffen MA~Xller, symbolic-module at steffen-mueller dot net
	 Stray Toaster, mwk at users dot sourceforge dot net
	 Oliver EbenhA~Xh

SEE ALSO
       New versions of this module can be found on http://steffen-mueller.net
       or CPAN. The module development takes place on Sourceforge at
       http://sourceforge.net/projects/math-symbolic/

       The following modules come with this distribution:

       Math::Symbolic::ExportConstants, Math::Symbolic::AuxFunctions

       Math::Symbolic::Base, Math::Symbolic::Operator,
       Math::Symbolic::Constant, Math::Symbolic::Variable

       Math::Symbolic::Custom, Math::Symbolic::Custom::Base,
       Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultTests,
       Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultMods
       Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultDumpers

       Math::Symbolic::Derivative, Math::Symbolic::MiscCalculus,
       Math::Symbolic::VectorCalculus, Math::Symbolic::MiscAlgebra

       Math::Symbolic::Parser, Math::Symbolic::Parser::Precompiled,
       Math::Symbolic::Compiler

       The following modules are extensions on CPAN that do not come with this
       distribution in order to keep the distribution size reasonable.

       Math::SymbolicX::Inline - (Inlined Math::Symbolic functions)

       Math::Symbolic::Custom::CCompiler (Compile Math::Symbolic trees to C
       for speed or for use in C code)

       Math::SymbolicX::BigNum (Big number support for the Math::Symbolic
       parser)

       Math::SymbolicX::Complex (Complex number support for the Math::Symbolic
       parser)

       Math::Symbolic::Custom::Contains (Find subtrees in Math::Symbolic
       expressions)

       Math::SymbolicX::ParserExtensionFactory (Generate parser extensions for
       the Math::Symbolic parser)

       Math::Symbolic::Custom::ErrorPropagation (Calculate Gaussian Error
       Propagation)

       Math::SymbolicX::Statistics::Distributions (Statistical Distributions
       as Math::Symbolic functions)

       Math::SymbolicX::NoSimplification (Turns off Math::Symbolic
       simplifications)

perl v5.14.1			  2011-07-26		     Math::Symbolic(3)
[top]

List of man pages available for Fedora

Copyright (c) for man pages and the logo by the respective OS vendor.

For those who want to learn more, the polarhome community provides shell access and support.

[legal] [privacy] [GNU] [policy] [cookies] [netiquette] [sponsors] [FAQ]
Tweet
Polarhome, production since 1999.
Member of Polarhome portal.
Based on Fawad Halim's script.
....................................................................
Vote for polarhome
Free Shell Accounts :: the biggest list on the net